|
|
Post by Vitxalmour Conductour on Jan 27, 2013 22:55:08 GMT -5
Don't we?
|
|
|
|
Post by suorsch on Jan 28, 2013 5:43:02 GMT -5
yes, the hell, we do  |
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Jan 28, 2013 6:21:08 GMT -5
If you are referring to consequences of the sock-puppet theatre of our party's Chancellor, I guess we'll have to elect a new Chancellor now.
And we might possibly suspend Eric's membership until after a trial, to see where we can go from there.
This is all sad on so many levels.
Anyway, opinions, please.
|
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Jan 28, 2013 10:03:11 GMT -5
And maybe the time has come to reveal the internet address of our forum, so that everyone who's interested can see that no conspiracies were and are plotted here.
By the way this may also be good advertisement that is attracting new members.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vitxalmour Conductour on Jan 28, 2013 12:22:35 GMT -5
Yes. It is time for us "termites" to come out of the woodwork.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iason Taiwos on Jan 28, 2013 17:15:24 GMT -5
Should we make some sort of official party statement saying that we were all unaware of what Eric was up to, and that this in no way reflects what the NPW is all about, and that we are all greatly disappointed and saddened by his actions? (Honestly, on my part, the initial shock and sadness has given way to almost...well, I wouldn't say admiration...but I'm impressed that he managed to keep this up for so long. Hard to believe there really isn't a slobbering oaf in Iowa with poor grammatical skills and an obsession with fart jokes...)
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jan 28, 2013 22:16:23 GMT -5
Holy shit. What's the story? All I see is Miestra's post referring to the events, is there an originating thread somewhere?
Edit to add: never mind, just found the King's post.
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jan 28, 2013 22:54:04 GMT -5
And maybe the time has come to reveal the internet address of our forum, so that everyone who's interested can see that no conspiracies were and are plotted here. By the way this may also be good advertisement that is attracting new members. Not sure I see the advertisement aspect. This makes us all look bad by association. Hell, Miestra was even apologizing for him having been a Republican. I'm pretty sure they all have the address anyway; there is a surprisingly large number of views on each post. We could trot it out if accused of wrongdoing. Dudes, I'm bummed. I can't talk about it yet; give me a day or two. |
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jan 28, 2013 22:57:33 GMT -5
Should we make some sort of official party statement saying that we were all unaware of what Eric was up to, and that this in no way reflects what the NPW is all about, and that we are all greatly disappointed and saddened by his actions? (Honestly, on my part, the initial shock and sadness has given way to almost...well, I wouldn't say admiration...but I'm impressed that he managed to keep this up for so long. Hard to believe there really isn't a slobbering oaf in Iowa with poor grammatical skills and an obsession with fart jokes...) Personally, I don't think so. It might have a bit of "doth protest too much" to it. |
|
|
|
Post by suorsch on Jan 29, 2013 4:08:43 GMT -5
i agree on suspension of eiric's chancellorship till the result of the trial.
nope to publishing this group unless we have a secret den here.
we have to officially say, that eiric is suspended during trial and who is the deputy. no apologising.
oh, my...
|
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Jan 29, 2013 4:36:11 GMT -5
I wouldn't say much except that to us he has been a creative member of the NPW and a good Chancellor, and that we didn't know about his "second life". I for one am as shocked as anybody else, yet I don't know if I have to repeat this every once in a while.
We might want to point out that before the Courts had a say, Eric is only suspected of having commited certain crimes, like in any other constitutional state. Therefor we are hoping that there will be a trial that clarifies all issues related to the incident.
Kind of, now our friendly anarchism comes chiming in hard. As we don't have membership rules, can we suspend Eric's membership, which is as informal as anybody else's membership? Who can be a member, does a membership lapse if someone renounces his / her Talossan citizenship?
Anyway, without much ado, we should elect and present a new Chancellor ASAP, because presently Eric can't and won't do his job, if only because of his howsoever temporary absence.
Who wants the job? Vitx? Iason? Andy? Ián?
|
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Jan 29, 2013 4:40:02 GMT -5
And maybe the time has come to reveal the internet address of our forum, so that everyone who's interested can see that no conspiracies were and are plotted here. By the way this may also be good advertisement that is attracting new members. Not sure I see the advertisement aspect. This makes us all look bad by association. Ahem. I didn't mean to say that Eric's "prank" is good advertisement. Of course it is not. But a certain degree of openess, some peculiarist glasnost might be good advertisement, though, whereas I can understand that too much of this might make us feel like fish in a fishbowl. |
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jan 29, 2013 6:14:47 GMT -5
Not sure I see the advertisement aspect. This makes us all look bad by association. Ahem. I didn't mean to say that Eric's "prank" is good advertisement. Of course it is not. But a certain degree of openess, some peculiarist glasnost might be good advertisement, though, whereas I can understand that too much of this might make us feel like fish in a fishbowl. Oh, I see-- I misunderstood you. |
|
|
|
Post by suorsch on Jan 29, 2013 7:11:36 GMT -5
i would like to ask iason taiwos and vitxalmour conductour if they would agree to be candidates for new npw chancellor election.
|
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jan 29, 2013 9:28:29 GMT -5
i would like to ask iason taiwos and vitxalmour conductour if they would agree to be candidates for new npw chancellor election. Seconded. |
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Jan 29, 2013 9:46:59 GMT -5
Yup.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vitxalmour Conductour on Jan 29, 2013 16:39:15 GMT -5
I don't see any reason or grounds to "kick him out" of the party. We should most definately replace him as an officer of the party though. There is nothing for us to apoligize for, as we were not a part of his actions.
|
|
|
|
Post by suorsch on Jan 30, 2013 3:32:48 GMT -5
I don't see any reason or grounds to "kick him out" of the party. We should most definately replace him as an officer of the party though. There is nothing for us to apoligize for, as we were not a part of his actions. i agree on no apologising part and also that we need not to kick eiric out, as the proposal is, we suspend his chancellorship and also his membership until trial. what we do thereafter is our business. from a perspective of outer optics, i would prefer to show that we do not agree with his actions to not be dragged in the mud with him, but friends are friends and politics is not worth loosing a friend. |
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Jan 30, 2013 5:42:34 GMT -5
Hear, hear.
|
|
|
|
Post by xhorxh on Feb 1, 2013 14:46:59 GMT -5
Hey, folks. Back to public life again.
|
|
